<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Searching the ideal commenting product for Plone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archiv.webmeisterei.com/friessnegger/2009/12/03/commenting-in-plone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archiv.webmeisterei.com/friessnegger/2009/12/03/commenting-in-plone/</link>
	<description>Webmeisterei,  Plone, Housing, Hosting, Premium, Portalentwicklung, Programmierung</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:27:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fRiSi</title>
		<link>http://archiv.webmeisterei.com/friessnegger/2009/12/03/commenting-in-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-8826</link>
		<dc:creator>fRiSi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmeisterei.com/?p=456#comment-8826</guid>
		<description>thanks for your valuable feedback guys.

i&#039;ll discuss the pros and cons with the customer (who already signaled a slight preference for disqus due to the twitter and facebook integration) and post the result here (expected jan 2010).

@stefan: sure, however i&#039;m not sure i&#039;ll make it to snowsprint this year :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for your valuable feedback guys.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll discuss the pros and cons with the customer (who already signaled a slight preference for disqus due to the twitter and facebook integration) and post the result here (expected jan 2010).</p>
<p>@stefan: sure, however i&#8217;m not sure i&#8217;ll make it to snowsprint this year <img src='http://archiv.webmeisterei.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Eletzhofer</title>
		<link>http://archiv.webmeisterei.com/friessnegger/2009/12/03/commenting-in-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-8640</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Eletzhofer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmeisterei.com/?p=456#comment-8640</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;m in the same need for a (very) high volume plone site.  I&#039;ll probably go the disqus route -- in the end I want to have all user-generated content handled and stored outside of plone (thus also eliminating the need to have ppl log into plone).  I also have forums and guestbooks to migrate which I hope to do using the same service.

Maybe team up on the snow sprint?  I don&#039;t mind working on p.a.discussion, too :^)

Cheers,
Stefan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the same need for a (very) high volume plone site.  I&#8217;ll probably go the disqus route &#8212; in the end I want to have all user-generated content handled and stored outside of plone (thus also eliminating the need to have ppl log into plone).  I also have forums and guestbooks to migrate which I hope to do using the same service.</p>
<p>Maybe team up on the snow sprint?  I don&#8217;t mind working on p.a.discussion, too :^)</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Stefan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volodymyr Cherepanyak</title>
		<link>http://archiv.webmeisterei.com/friessnegger/2009/12/03/commenting-in-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-8637</link>
		<dc:creator>Volodymyr Cherepanyak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmeisterei.com/?p=456#comment-8637</guid>
		<description>We at Quintagroup use in production q.plonecomments a lot in both Plone 2.5.x and 3.x. As soon as we will be able to introduce Plone 4 in our projects we expect to provide a way to switch to p.a.discussion. Also I hope we will find time to contribute to p.a.discussion as we will have few running instances of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We at Quintagroup use in production q.plonecomments a lot in both Plone 2.5.x and 3.x. As soon as we will be able to introduce Plone 4 in our projects we expect to provide a way to switch to p.a.discussion. Also I hope we will find time to contribute to p.a.discussion as we will have few running instances of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Aspeli</title>
		<link>http://archiv.webmeisterei.com/friessnegger/2009/12/03/commenting-in-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-8630</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Aspeli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmeisterei.com/?p=456#comment-8630</guid>
		<description>If you are able to help contribute to its development (e.g. bugfixes, testing), then I think p.a.discussion is the way to go. It&#039;s got better architecture, and has a committed maintainer in Timo. It didn&#039;t quite make Plone 4.0, but may make 4.x and I&#039;d expect it in 5.

If you want something close to vanilla and low risk, then collective.discussionplus is probably the safest bet, in that it doesn&#039;t do much. I think it&#039;ll work with Plone 4 (the comment in the readme should really refer to Plone 5, which we called 4 at the time).

Quintagroup&#039;s product has also been around a long time and so is probably also a safe bet.

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are able to help contribute to its development (e.g. bugfixes, testing), then I think p.a.discussion is the way to go. It&#8217;s got better architecture, and has a committed maintainer in Timo. It didn&#8217;t quite make Plone 4.0, but may make 4.x and I&#8217;d expect it in 5.</p>
<p>If you want something close to vanilla and low risk, then collective.discussionplus is probably the safest bet, in that it doesn&#8217;t do much. I think it&#8217;ll work with Plone 4 (the comment in the readme should really refer to Plone 5, which we called 4 at the time).</p>
<p>Quintagroup&#8217;s product has also been around a long time and so is probably also a safe bet.</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timo Stollenwerk</title>
		<link>http://archiv.webmeisterei.com/friessnegger/2009/12/03/commenting-in-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-8629</link>
		<dc:creator>Timo Stollenwerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmeisterei.com/?p=456#comment-8629</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;m still actively developing p.a.discussion and it has been used in production by teamrubber since its pre-alpha1 state. I think Jarn is also using it for a project. I hope to release a first beta version soon. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Timo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still actively developing p.a.discussion and it has been used in production by teamrubber since its pre-alpha1 state. I think Jarn is also using it for a project. I hope to release a first beta version soon. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.</p>
<p>Timo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

